Is Freedom Linked To Happiness?

Professor Rummel offers an exploration of the utilitarian argument for freedom. Essentially, social and political freedoms promote subjective well-being (particularly happiness and satisfaction) in the general population: policies promoting freedom are therefore desirable. In many ways, these freedoms are qualitatively different freedoms than the ones discussed in Schwartz's recent account of the freedom to choose and falling behind the Joneses.

Rummel discusses several well-reported findings in the cross-cultural analyses of subjective well-being (SWB). He reports that SWB is "critical to the stability of a nation's political institutions and particularly the stability of democracy". However, Rummel goes on to detail further analyses that may emphasise the role of other factors. He quotes Inglehart and Klingemman's conclusion:

These findings in no way refute the evidence that genetic factors play an important role in subjective well-being; we find that evidence compelling. But these findings do indicate that genetic factors are only part of the story. Happiness levels vary cross-culturally. Since cultures are constructed by human beings, this suggests that the pursuit of happiness is not completely futile. Genes may play a crucial role, but beliefs and values also are important. Our findings also indicate that varying levels of well-being are closely linked with a society's political institutions: sharp declines in a society's level of well-being can lead to the collapse of the social and political system; while high levels of well-being contribute to the survival and flourishing of democratic institutions.

Rummel's final analysis leads him to conclude that freedom does display the highest correlation with well-being. However, in line with Schwartz's work, it does seem as if the nature of the freedom is relevant: there are significant individual differences that govern how well we can cope with some freedoms and choice.

Copyright 2006, Tony Plant Happystance Project