Fish v. Drugs for Children And Criminals

When most of us think about Eating Our Way To Happiness we tend to think delicious doesn't exist on the same spectrum as nutritious. There are several T.V. advertising campaigns promising happiness in association with foodstuffs at present. Pop Quiz. Do you think that these foodstuffs are vegetables or confectionery? Nutrient-dense or nutrient-poor? How much truth is there in this advertising?

Does it matter? Well, according to research conducted in prisons, the nutritional profile of what we eat may matter a great deal. Physiologist Bernard Gesch had lead this research in UK prisons and is quoted as claiming that:

Research suggests that we may have seriously under-estimated the importance of nutrition for our social behaviour. Since the 1950s there has been a ten-fold increase in offences. How else can we explain that but by diet? It is not down to genetics. The main change over that period has been in nutrients.

Gesch's trials with supplements in a prison population indicated that inmates responded with a drop by more than a third in their level of antisocial behaviour (as measured by assaults and similar transgressions) relative to their previous records. For some, this raises questions about the link between diet and behaviour, and the link between violence and free will. Gesch was interviewed on the topic for the New York Times [behind a paywall] and argues:

Eating Our Way To Happiness?

Interesting item in The Independent about a move away from eating some processed food. It looks like there is a conscious avoidance of some of the foods that are publicly linked to obesity, heart disease and other illnesses.

I'm not overconfident that replacing Mars bars and Snickers with Aeros or Flakes is quite the health message that various commentators meant to communicate. But some of the other statistics are interesting - if they are reliable.

It will be fascinating to see whether there is an increase in happiness and a decrease in other illnesses as the effects of the new eating habits become more widespread.

Copyright 2006, Tony Plant Happystance Project

The Heart of the Matter: Why Context Rules

GeekNurse has posted a tracing of a baby’s heart activity. It’s one of those occasions where a straight reading might have prompted concern that there was a major cardiac problem. However, with the nurse’s special understanding of the context, the trace is correctly interpreted as innocent of any sinister problem (I’m not giving the solution here, it’s a nice surprise). [April 2006 edit. Sadly, this excellent blog has been taken down so this example is no longer available. The solution was that the nurse had been present when the baby hiccoughed, causing the irregularity in the trace.]

I’m attracted to this example because it is a striking instance of the need to understand the full context of data before interpreting it appropriately. And this is yet another re-working of my continued thinking on the topic of whether unhappiness is a symptom or a passing phase.

Unhappiness is inevitable as a response to life events: it is appropriate in the current context of that life. There may come a point when the degree of unhappiness paralyses a person’s ability to function on many levels, both socially and economically. Somewhere on that continuum unhappiness became a symptom in need of a remedy or intervention, whether pharmacological or psychosocial. Identifying that point of cross-over seems to be an art-form.

Positive psychology emphasises the many benefits of positive emotions, from greater personal success to better immune systems and improved longevity. One of the most repeatable findings seems to be that unhappiness is inevitable, but it is our resilience to life events and circumstances that governs our outcomes. It seems that we can cultivate resilience by cultivating positive emotions.