Shinga was so fed up at the lack of costings for mental health treatment for children that she has attempted it for herself.
Shinga mentions the need to treat both the child and probably at least one other member of the family. She discusses the 'dispiriting' overlap between mental health problems in children and special educational needs (itself a very costly area). The figures are imperfect and far from comprehensive for the reasons that she describes: nonetheless, it is an interesting and grim read. We are constantly being told that children are our future: is this how we treat them? Is this the best quality investment we are making in the future of our citizens and our economy?
Some commentators greeted the announcement that children in Wellington College are to be taught resilience and happiness with derision. I wonder if the costs of introducing such topics in school would reach more pupils, more quickly, than waiting for the implentation of a large-scale mental health treatment programme that doesn't seem to exist? The children who need more specialised treatment need it. But, in the interim, and for those in the hinterland of having a mental health condition that is not yet serious enough to warrant a psychiatric intervention, what would be the costs of providing Laughter and resilience sessions in schools? The Laughter Leaders could be parent volunteers, local volunteers or maybe even some of the Classroom Assistants. I shall think about this scheme.
Copyright 2006, Tony Plant Happystance Project
statement | special educational needs | schools | mental health | economics | children


Recent comments
1 year 45 weeks ago
1 year 46 weeks ago
1 year 48 weeks ago
1 year 48 weeks ago
1 year 48 weeks ago
1 year 48 weeks ago
1 year 49 weeks ago
1 year 49 weeks ago
1 year 49 weeks ago
1 year 49 weeks ago